ARTICLE

EFFECT OF 5ES INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL ON ACHIEVEMENT OF SECONDARY LEVEL STUDENTS IN PHYSICS

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

26 Pages : 258-269

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).26      10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).26      Published : Mar 2022

Effect of 5Es Instructional Model on Achievement of Secondary Level Students in Physics

Abstract

    The use of the 5Es instructional model develops a deep conceptual understanding of learning in sciences. The study was conducted on a sample of 80 students who were randomly selected from a public school in district Sargodha during the academic session 2020-2021. For this study, a pretest-post test control group design was used. An intervention program based on a constructive learning approach and academic achievement test in physics were used. The study's main objective is to determine the effectiveness of secondary students' achievement in physics through the 5Es instructional model and lecture method. An achievement test was administered to both groups as a pre and post-test in order to assess their achievements. The data obtained were tabulated and analyzed by using SPSS to means,standard deviation and t-value. It is concluded that instruction based on 5Es instructional model caused significantly better achievement as compared to the lecture method. It is therefore recommended that5Es instructional model may be organized as an essential component for in-service and pre-service teachers' training programs.

    5Es Instructional Model, Physics, Achievements, Lecture Method,

    (1) Saeed Muhammad Nadeem
    PhD Scholar, Institute of Education and Research, University of Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Ahmed Sher Awan
    Associate Professor, Institute of Education and Research, University of Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Aksela, M. (2015). Effect of computer-assisted inquiry (ICT) on Higher Order Thinking Skills in Physics. PhD Dissertation Published, University of Helsinki. Finland.
  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2017).Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
  • Brew, A. (2017). Teaching and Research: New Relationships and their Implications for Inquiry based Teaching and Learning in higher education, Higher Education Research & Development 22(1), 3-18.
  • BSCS. (2019). BSCS Science: An Inquiry Approach. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company
  • Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2016). The BSCS 5Es instructional model: origins and effectiveness. Office of Science Education National Institutes Of Health. 1-80
  • Champagne, A. (2017). The Psychological Basis for a Model of Science Instruction.Commissioned Paper for IBM- supported Design Project.
  • Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (2016). All other Things being Equal: Acquisition and Transfer of the Control of Variables Strategy. Child Development, 70(5): 1098-1120.
  • Cutnell, J. D., & Johnson, K. W. (2017). Physics (7th ed.). New Jersey: John Willey & Sons Inc.
  • Dewey, J. (1999). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31(787), 121- 127.
  • Ergin, KanlO, U., & Unsal, Y. (2018). An example for the effect of 5Es model on the academic success and attitude levels of students’: “inclined projectile motion”.TÃœFED-TUSED/ 5(3),
  • Galileo Educational Network, (2014). What is inquiry? Inquiry & ICT. http://www.galileo.org/inquiry- what.html
  • Gupta, V. K. (2019). Teaching and Learning of Science and Technology. Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.
  • Hake, R. (2018). Interactive Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A six-Hours and student Survey of Mechanics Test data for Introductory Physics courses. American Association of Physics Teachers. 66, 64-74.
  • Halai, N. (2019). Scientific inquiry within reach of young children. International Publications.
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina, Minn. Interaction Books 28(25),
  • Keskin, V. (2018). Effectiveness of constructivist 5E learning cycle model on high school students’ learning of simple pendulum concepts and attitudes.
  • Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2016). The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction: Effects of Direct Instruction and Discovery Learning. Psychological Science 15(10), 661-667.
  • Lawson, A. E. (2012). Science Teaching and Development of Thinking. Wadswoth/Thomson Learning.
  • Martins, O., & Oyebanji, P. K. (2016). The Effects of Inquiry and Lecture Methods on the Cognitive Achievement of Integrated Science Students. Journal of the Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria, 35(1&2), 31-35.
  • McDermott. (2019) Physics by Inquiry, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Mukherjee, A. (2014). Promoting Higher- Order Thinking Skills in MIS/CIS Students Using Class Exercise. Journal of Information System.
  • Mulligan, J. F. (2015).Introductory College Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill. NASSP Bulletin, 85(623), 24–34.
  • Oliver, R. (2017). Exploring an Inquiry-Based Learning Approach with First-Year Students in a Large Undergraduate Class, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 3-15.
  • Prince, M., & Felder, R. M. (2017). The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning.Journal of College Science Teaching, 36, 14- 20.
  • Shrigley, R. L., Koballa, T. R., & Simpson, R. D. (2018). Defining Attitude for Science Educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 659–678.
  • Tamir, P. (2015). Content Analysis Focusing on Inquiry. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(1), 87-94.
  • Wang, H., & Posey, L. (2016). An Inquiry- Based linear Algebra Class, Online Submission, US-China Education Review, 4, 489-494.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Nadeem, S. M., & Awan, A. S. (2022). Effect of 5Es Instructional Model on Achievement of Secondary Level Students in Physics. Global Educational Studies Review, VII(I), 258-269. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).26

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Nadeem, Saeed Muhammad, and Ahmed Sher Awan. 2022. "Effect of 5Es Instructional Model on Achievement of Secondary Level Students in Physics." Global Educational Studies Review, VII (I): 258-269 doi: 10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).26

HARVARD

    HARVARD : NADEEM, S. M. & AWAN, A. S. 2022. Effect of 5Es Instructional Model on Achievement of Secondary Level Students in Physics. Global Educational Studies Review, VII, 258-269.

MHRA

    MHRA : Nadeem, Saeed Muhammad, and Ahmed Sher Awan. 2022. "Effect of 5Es Instructional Model on Achievement of Secondary Level Students in Physics." Global Educational Studies Review, VII: 258-269

MLA

    MLA : Nadeem, Saeed Muhammad, and Ahmed Sher Awan. "Effect of 5Es Instructional Model on Achievement of Secondary Level Students in Physics." Global Educational Studies Review, VII.I (2022): 258-269 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Nadeem, Saeed Muhammad and Awan, Ahmed Sher (2022), "Effect of 5Es Instructional Model on Achievement of Secondary Level Students in Physics", Global Educational Studies Review, VII (I), 258-269

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Nadeem, Saeed Muhammad, and Ahmed Sher Awan. "Effect of 5Es Instructional Model on Achievement of Secondary Level Students in Physics." Global Educational Studies Review VII, no. I (2022): 258-269. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).26