ARTICLE

EXAMINING THE DIFFERENCE IN TEACHERS INSTRUCTIONAL BEHAVIOR ON THE BASIS OF THE DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

40 Pages : 414- 424

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).40      10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).40      Published : Mar 2022

Examining the Difference in Teachers' Instructional Behavior on the Basis of the Demographic Variables at the Secondary Level

Abstract

    This quantitative study aimed at investigating the teachers' instructional behavior on the basis of demographic variables at the secondary level. Okara and Sahiwal instructors from secondary schools took part in the research. Teachers were asked questions using a five-point scale. The data was analyzed using SPSS and the results indicated that there is no significant difference in the instructional behavior of the students based on demographic variables i.e., gender, area, experience, age, and qualification. This data may be beneficial to teachers learning motivation and how to teach and may provide valuable assistance in secondary school classes.

    Instructional, Behaviour, Demographic Variables, Secondary Level, Education

    (1) Riaz Ahmad
    Mphil (Education Leadership and Management) Scholar, The Superior College, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Muhammad Aamir Hashmi
    Associate Professor, Institute of Education and Research (IER), University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Muhammad Mukhtyar
    Lecturer Physics, Divisional Public School and College, Dera Ghazi Khan, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Abell, M. M., Jung, E., & Taylor, M. (2011). Students’ perceptions of classroom instructional environments in the context of “Universal Design for Learning.” Learning Environments Research, 14(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-011-9090-2
  • Artvinli, E. (2010). Teaching styles for geography teachers. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 9(33), 387- 408.
  • Asiyai, R. (2011). Effective Classroom Management Techniques for Secondary Schools. African Research Review, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v5i1.64526
  • Bassey, N. (2012). To cook a continent: destructive extraction and the climate crisis in Africa. Pambazuka Press.
  • Borgia, L. G., Cheek, E. H., Launey, B. L., & Steward, F. A. (2004). Facilitative reading instruction; Preservice teachers' voice and perceptions. Reading improvement, 41(2), 129-142.
  • Campbell, R. J., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, R. D., & Robinson, W. (2004). Effective teaching and values: Some implications for research and teacher appraisal. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 451-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000303955
  • Charlie, M. U. (2006). Discipline and Management in the Classroom: Theory and practice. Kaduna: Joyce Graphic Printer and Publishers Company, Nigeria.
  • Collins, J. W., & O’Brein, P. (2003). The greenwood dictionary of education Westport, CT; Greenwood press.
  • Collinson, E. (2000). A Survey of Elementary Students’ Learning Style Preferences and Academic Success. Cotemporary Education, 7(4), 42-48.
  • Cook, V. (1991). Second language learning and language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Dalley, J. (2009). Purpose and value in reflection. Connecting Reflective Learning, Teaching and Assessment, 18.
  • Effiong, U. A. (2007). Dealing with Disruptive Behaviours in the Classroom. Calabar: HilcopPrinting Press, Nigeria.
  • Ekere, O. S. (2006). Concept of Disruptive Behaviour Among Students in Public SecondarySchools. Uyo: Ekpeyong Publishers, Nigeria.
  • Emmer, E. T., & Stough, L. M. (2003). Classroom management: A critical part of educational psychology, with implications for teacher education. In Educational psychologist , 103-112. Routledge.
  • Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International journal of engineering education, 21(1), 103-112.
  • Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2002).Understanding student differences. Journal of engineering education, 94(11), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00829.x
  • Fritz, M. (2002). Using learning styles inventories to promote active learning process. Journal of college reading and learning, 32(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2002.10850297
  • Giallo, R., & Little, E. (2003). Classroom behaviour problems: The relationship between preparedness, classroom experiences, and self-efficacy in graduate and student teachers. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 21-34.
  • Gracia, F. C., & Hughes, E. H. (2000). Learning and thinking styles: an analysis of their inter-relationship: an influence on academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 20(4), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/713663755
  • Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style: a practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. San Barnardino, CA; Alliance Publishers.
  • Gregore, A. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: their nature and effects. In student learning styles. Diagonising and prescribing programs. Reston, V A: National association of secondary school principals.
  • Hartzler-Miller, C. (2001). Making sense of “best practice” in teaching history. Theory & Research in Social Education, 29(4),672-695. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2001.10505961
  • Jackson, P. A. (2005). Incoming international students and the library: a survey. Reference services review, 33(2), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320510597408
  • Johansen, A., Little, S. G., & Akin-Little, A. (2011). An Examination of New Zealand Teachers' Attributions and Perceptions of Behaviour, Classroom Management, and the Level of Formal Teacher Training Received in Behaviour Management. Kairaranga, 12(2), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v3i9.2806
  • Macfadyen, T. & Bailey, R., (2002). Teaching physical education: 11-18., London: Continuum.
  • Manurung, K. (2012). Creative teachers and effective teaching strategies that motivates learners to learn. Indonesian Journal of science education, 2(1), 1-8.
  • Marzano, R. (2008). Getting serious about school reform: Three critical commitments. Bloomington, IN: Marzano Research Laboratory.
  • Morse, J. M. (2012). The implications of interview type and structure in mixed- method designs. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft, 193-204.
  • Naimie, Z., Siraj, S., Ahmed, A. R., & Shagholi, R. (2010). Hypothesized Learners' Technology Preferences Based on Learning Style Dimensions. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology- TOJET, 9(4), 83-93.
  • Nicholas, A. (2007). Implementing a Note- Taking Training Program for Under- Achieving University Students: The Process and Problems Encountered.
  • Ogunu, M. (2000). Introduction to Educational Management. Benin City: Mabogun Publishers.
  • Oyira, E. (2006). Effects of Classroom Learning Environment of Secondary School Students Attitude towards Schooling. Journal of Research in Education, 5(4).
  • Pandey, L. P. (2006). The Rudiments of Classroom Management. Lagos: Ikeli Printing Press, Nigeria.
  • Paris, S.G., & Stahl, S.A. (2004). Current issues in reading comprehension and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbrum Associates.
  • Reinsmith, W. A. (1992). Archetypal forms in teaching: A continuum (Vol. 56). Greenwood Publishing Group.
  • Rickford, J. R. (2005). Using the vernacular to teach the standard. Ebonics: The urban education debate, 2, 18-40. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597985-004
  • Shieh, L. J. (2005). A study of gifted students' learning style and preference on teaching style.(Unpublished masters’ thesis), Taipei Municipal University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Siedentop, D. (1998). What is sport education and how does it work?. Journal of physical education, recreation & dance, 69(4), 18- 20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1998.10605528
  • Stitt-Gohdes, W. L. (2001). Business Education Students' Preferred Learning Styles and Their Teachers' Preferred Instructional Styles: Do They Match? Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 43(3), 137-151.
  • Terzi, Ç. (2001). Ögretmenlerin Sınıf Yönetimi Anlayıslarına Ä°liskin Görüslerinin Belirlenmesi. Unpublished master’s thesis, AnadoluÃœniversitesi, Eskisehir.
  • Umoren, I. P. (2010). The concept of Classroom Management in Modern Society. Uyo: MGONigerian publishers.
  • Williams, K. C. (2008). Elementary classroom management: A student-centered approach to leading and learning. Sage Publications.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Ahmad, R., Hashmi, M. A., & Mukhtyar, M. (2022). Examining the Difference in Teachers' Instructional Behavior on the Basis of the Demographic Variables at the Secondary Level. Global Educational Studies Review, VII(I), 414- 424. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).40

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Ahmad, Riaz, Muhammad Aamir Hashmi, and Muhammad Mukhtyar. 2022. "Examining the Difference in Teachers' Instructional Behavior on the Basis of the Demographic Variables at the Secondary Level." Global Educational Studies Review, VII (I): 414- 424 doi: 10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).40

HARVARD

    HARVARD : AHMAD, R., HASHMI, M. A. & MUKHTYAR, M. 2022. Examining the Difference in Teachers' Instructional Behavior on the Basis of the Demographic Variables at the Secondary Level. Global Educational Studies Review, VII, 414- 424.

MHRA

    MHRA : Ahmad, Riaz, Muhammad Aamir Hashmi, and Muhammad Mukhtyar. 2022. "Examining the Difference in Teachers' Instructional Behavior on the Basis of the Demographic Variables at the Secondary Level." Global Educational Studies Review, VII: 414- 424

MLA

    MLA : Ahmad, Riaz, Muhammad Aamir Hashmi, and Muhammad Mukhtyar. "Examining the Difference in Teachers' Instructional Behavior on the Basis of the Demographic Variables at the Secondary Level." Global Educational Studies Review, VII.I (2022): 414- 424 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Ahmad, Riaz, Hashmi, Muhammad Aamir, and Mukhtyar, Muhammad (2022), "Examining the Difference in Teachers' Instructional Behavior on the Basis of the Demographic Variables at the Secondary Level", Global Educational Studies Review, VII (I), 414- 424

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Ahmad, Riaz, Muhammad Aamir Hashmi, and Muhammad Mukhtyar. "Examining the Difference in Teachers' Instructional Behavior on the Basis of the Demographic Variables at the Secondary Level." Global Educational Studies Review VII, no. I (2022): 414- 424. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).40