ARTICLE

PRECEDENT STUDY AN APPROACH TO LEARNING ABOUT DESIGN CHALLENGES IN ARCHITECTURAL STUDIO PEDAGOGY

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

38 Pages : 395-403

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).38      10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).38      Published : Mar 2022

Precedent Study: An Approach to Learning about Design Challenges in Architectural Studio Pedagogy

Abstract

    The Application of precedents in the Instruction of Architecture Studio is an essential but frequently miscalculated component of the architecture curriculum. The Architectural Design process is an ever-evolving phenomenon. Concrete examples help to establish this evolution that includes the detailed study of Precedents. It is found that there is a connection between architectural design studio pedagogy and precedent study by thoroughly analyzing previously published literature. Since the precedents serve as the basis for further research, appropriate solutions are sought to increase relevance and performance. Therefore, Precedent-based instruction is the most effective teaching method in an Architectural design studio. This study has identified a few frequent errors when performing precedent studies, i.e., romanticizing decisions in Precedent Studies, neglecting Context, and shallow appreciation without a systematic way. This study offers potential for further research to devise an appropriate tool to conduct an analytical study of precedents to avoid falsification and non-contextual solutions.

    Precedent Study, Architecture Studio, Context, Falsification

    (1) Aneela Yaseen
    Assistant Professor, Architecture Department, COMSATS University (CUI), Islamabad Campus, Pakistan
    (2) Muhammad Waqas
    Assistant Professor, Architecture Department, COMSATS University (CUI), Islamabad Campus, Pakistan.
    (3) Arshia Mukhtar
    Lecturer, Architecture Department, COMSATS University (CUI), Islamabad Campus, Pakistan
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Aberg-Bengtsson, L. (1999). Dimensions of performance in the interpretation of diagrams, tables, and maps: Some gender differences in the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 565-582.
  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: The truth about the male and female brain. New York: Basic Books.
  • Bell, J. F. (2001). Investigating gender differences in the science performance of 16-year-old pupils in the UK. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 469-486.
  • Boyd, W.M. (1981). Fighting myths, facing problems, and framing a new reality. In The minority student in public schools. Fostering academic excellence. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Campbell, P.B. (1993). Practicality and passion: Gender issues in science. In Girls and the physical sciences: Symposium highlights. Concord, MA: National Coalition of Girls' Schools.
  • Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.366032030 5
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook- Harvey, C. Barron, B. & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, Volume 24, 2020 - Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018 .1537791
  • Debacker, T. K., & Nelson, R. M. (2000). Motivation to Learn Science: Differences Related to Gender, Class Type, and Ability. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/002206700095 98713
  • Fehrmann, P. G., Keith, T. Z., & Reimers, T. M. (1987). Home Influence on School Learning: Direct and Indirect Effects of Parental Involvement on High School Grades. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(6), 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1987 .10885778
  • Gibbons, A. (1992). Growing Scientists for the 21st Century. Science, 258(5085), 1195. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.258.508 5.1195
  • Greenfield, T. A. (1996). Gender, ethnicity, science achievement, and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 901-933.
  • Hilton, T. L., & Lee, V. E. (1988). Student Interest and Persistence in Science: Changes in the Educational Pipeline in the Last Decade. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(5), 510. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981701
  • Hoffer, T.B., Rasinski, K.A., & Moore, W. (1995). Social background differences in high school mathematics and science course-taking and achievement. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Education.
  • Horn, L. (1990). Trends in high school math and science course taking: Effects of gender and ethnic. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 319 593)
  • Iverson, B., & Walberg, H. (1982). Home environment and school learning: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Experimental Education, 50(3), 144-151
  • Jones, L.R., Mullis, I.V.S., Raizen, S.A., Weiss, I.R., & Weston, E.A. (1992). The 1990 science report card. Washington, DC: Educational Testing Services.
  • Jovanovic, J. & King, S. S. (1998). Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: who's doing the performing? American Educational Research Journal, 35, 477-496.
  • Kahle, J. B. (2004). Will girls be left behind? Gender differences and accountability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 961-969.
  • Kahle, J. B., Parker, L. H., Rennie, L. J., & Riley, D. (1993). Gender differences in science education: Building a model. Educational Psychologist, 28(4), 379-404.
  • Keeves, J. P. (1975). The home, the school, and achievement in mathematics and science. Science Education, 59, 439-460
  • Keith, P. B., & Lichtman, M. V. (1994). Does parental involvement influence the academic achievement of Mexican- American eighth graders? Results from the National Education Longitudinal Study. School Psychology Quarterly, 9, 256-272.
  • Keith, T. Z., Reimers, T. M., Fehrmann, P. G., Pottebaum, S. M., & Aubey, L. W. (1986). Parental involvement, homework, and TV time: Direct and indirect effects on high school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 373-380.
  • Lytton, H., & Pyryt, M. C. (1998). Predictors of achievement in basic skills: A Canadian effective schools study. Canadian Journal of Education, 23(3), 281-301.
  • Ma, X., & Klinger, D. A. (2004). Hierarchical linear modeling of student and school effects on academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(1), 41- 55.
  • Madigan, T. (1997). Science proficiency and course taking in high school: The relationship of course-taking patterns to increases in science proficiency between 8th and 12th grades. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Manning, M. L. (1998). Gender differences in young adolescents' mathematics and science achievement. Childhood Education, 74(3), 168-171.
  • Mason, C. L., & Kahle, J. B. (1989). Student attitudes toward science and science- related careers: A program designed to promote a stimulating gender-free learning environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(1), 25- 39. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.366026 0104
  • Mattern, N., & Schau, C. (2002). Gender differences in science attitude- achievement relationships over time among white middle-school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 324-340.
  • McEwen,A., Knipe, D.,&Gallagher, T. (1997). Science and arts choices at A-level in Northern Ireland: A ten-year perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 761-771.
  • Muller, C. (1993). Parental involvement and academic achievement: An analysis of family resources available to the child. In B. Schneider & J. S. Coleman (Eds.), Parents, their children, and schools (pp. 77-113). Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
  • Muller, P. A., Stage, F. K., & Kinzie, J. (2001). Science Achievement Growth Trajectories: Understanding Factors Related to Gender and Racial-Ethnic Differences in Precollege Science Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 981-1012. https://doi.org/10.3102/000283120380 04981
  • Mullis, I.V.S., Dossey, J.A., Foertsch, M.A., Jones, L.R., & Gentile, C.A. (1991). Trends in academic progress: Achievement of U.S. students in science, 1969-70 to 1990; mathematics, 1973 to 1990; reading, 1971 to 1990; writing, 1984 to 1990. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). TIMSS 2007 Results. http://nces.ed.gov/timss/results07_scien ce95.asp
  • Norvilitis, J.M., Reid, H.W., & Norvilitis, B.M. (2002). Success in everyday physics: The role of personality and academic variables. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(5), 394-409.
  • Preece, P.F.W., Skinner, N.C., & Riall, R.A.H. (1999). The gender gap and discriminating power in the National Curriculum Key Stage Three science assessments in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 979-987.
  • Rana, R. A. (2002). Effect of parents, socioeconomic status, students, self-concept and gender on science-related attitudes and achievement (Doctoral Thesis). Lahore: IER, University of the Punjab.
  • Roscigno, V. J., & Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W. (1999). Race and cultural/educationalresources: Inequality, micro-political processes, and achievement returns. Sociology of Education, 72(3), 158-178.
  • Sammons, P., West, A., & Hind, A. (1997). Accounting for variations in pupil attainment at the end of key stage 1. British Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 489-511.
  • Schibeci, R. A. (1989). Home, school, and peer group influences on student attitudes and achievement in science. Science Education, 73, 13-24.
  • Sencar, S., & Eryilmaz, A. (2004). Factors mediating the effect of gender on ninth- grade Turkish students' misconceptions concerning electric circuits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 603-616.
  • Solomon, J. (1997). Girls' science education: Choice, solidarity and culture. International Journal of Science Education, 19(4), 407-417.
  • Stamovlasis, D., Dimos, A., & Tsaparlis, G. (2006). A study of group interaction processes in learning lower secondary physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(6), 556-576. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20134
  • Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit Books.
  • Von Rhoneck, C., Grob, K., Schnaitmann, G.W., & Volker, B. (1998). Learning in basic electricity: How do motivation, cognitive and classroom climate factors influence achievement in physics? International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 551-565.
  • Xin, T., Xu, Z., & Tatsuoka, K. (2004). Linkage between teacher quality, student achievement, and cognitive skills: A rule- space model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30(3), 205-223.
  • Zohar, A., & Sela, D. (2003). Her physics, his physics: Gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 245-268

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Yaseen, A., Waqas, M., & Mukhtar, A. (2022). Precedent Study: An Approach to Learning about Design Challenges in Architectural Studio Pedagogy. Global Educational Studies Review, VII(I), 395-403. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).38

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Yaseen, Aneela, Muhammad Waqas, and Arshia Mukhtar. 2022. "Precedent Study: An Approach to Learning about Design Challenges in Architectural Studio Pedagogy." Global Educational Studies Review, VII (I): 395-403 doi: 10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).38

HARVARD

    HARVARD : YASEEN, A., WAQAS, M. & MUKHTAR, A. 2022. Precedent Study: An Approach to Learning about Design Challenges in Architectural Studio Pedagogy. Global Educational Studies Review, VII, 395-403.

MHRA

    MHRA : Yaseen, Aneela, Muhammad Waqas, and Arshia Mukhtar. 2022. "Precedent Study: An Approach to Learning about Design Challenges in Architectural Studio Pedagogy." Global Educational Studies Review, VII: 395-403

MLA

    MLA : Yaseen, Aneela, Muhammad Waqas, and Arshia Mukhtar. "Precedent Study: An Approach to Learning about Design Challenges in Architectural Studio Pedagogy." Global Educational Studies Review, VII.I (2022): 395-403 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Yaseen, Aneela, Waqas, Muhammad, and Mukhtar, Arshia (2022), "Precedent Study: An Approach to Learning about Design Challenges in Architectural Studio Pedagogy", Global Educational Studies Review, VII (I), 395-403

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Yaseen, Aneela, Muhammad Waqas, and Arshia Mukhtar. "Precedent Study: An Approach to Learning about Design Challenges in Architectural Studio Pedagogy." Global Educational Studies Review VII, no. I (2022): 395-403. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-I).38