Impact of Community of Practice (COPs) on Inter-University Research Partnerships and Socio-Collaborative Culture in Balochistan
Foundations of Higher Education (HE), public and private, are going through a critical state while going through subsidizing or funding cuts, educational cost increments, and layoffs. An all-encompassing methodology is fundamental whereby greatness in instructing and learning just as research examination ought to be a definitive point of the objective. Among the different approaches to accomplish this is the advancement of communities of practices (CoPs) among the scholastic academics. In this manner, CoPs are to be viewed as an extension of any program to accomplish excellence because it is the sharing of the tacit knowledge that impacts any association in its interest for a competitive advantage. This research examination presents that CoPs positively influence creating academic linkages/collisions with different other universities of the region for knowledge-sharing. It explains the overall impact of CoPs on building collisions among universities. The explorative research study follows a mixed-method approach with qualitative and quantitative research design. However, the research examination concludes that CoP impacts the cycle of knowledge sharing by creating and overseeing linkages among universities to advance explorative research culture and innovation. In light of the findings, the research investigation suggests further skylines for comparative exploratory research relating to the transfer of knowledge and barriers in knowledge sharing for CoPs inside institutions and organizations.
-
Knowledge Management, Community of Practice, Academic Alliance, Research Partnership, Research Collaborative Environment, Socio-collaborative Culture
-
(1) Ghazala Yaqoob
MS Scholar, Sardar Bahadur Khan Women University, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan.
(2) Saubia Ramzan
Dean, Faculty of Management Sciences, Business and IT, University of Balochistan, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan
(3) Nagina Gul
Assistant Professor of Management Sciences, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences (BUITEMS) Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan.
- Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2003). Universities as Research Partners. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 485-491. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.2003.85.2.485
- Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.2003.85.2.485
- Creswell, J. W., & Tashakkori, A. (2007). Editorial: Developing Publishable Mixed Methods Manuscripts. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298644
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin &Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Dr, J. F. (2009, May). Partnership Research: A review of approaches and challenges in conducting research in partnership with service users. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper (pp 1-23).
- Dussauge, P., & Garrette, B. (1995). Determinants of Success in International Strategic Alliances: Evidence from the Global Aerospace Industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 505-530. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.849084 8
- Erasmus, R. (2005). The impact of communities of Practices (cop) on inter-firm alliance research teams. University of South Africa, 1, 132.
- Gongla, P., & Rizzuto, C. R. (2001). Evolving communities of practice: IBM Global Services experience. IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 842-862. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.404.0842
- Group, T. J. (2015). Inter-University Consortium for Promotion of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts (IUPCSS). Islamabad: The Jang News Group.
- Iverson, J., & McPhee, R. (2002, November). 'Knowledge Management in Communities of Practise: Being true to the Communicative Character of Communication. Management Communication Quarterly. 16(2), 259-266.
- Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London/Beverley Hills: Sage
- Law, J., & Hassard, J. ((1999). Actor-network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Markus, M. L., Manville, B., & Agres, C. E. (2000). 'What makes a virtual Organization work?'. Sloan Management Review. Fall 2000. 42(1), 13-14.
- McDermott, R. (2001). Knowing in Community: 10 Critical Success Factors in Building Communities of Practice. http://del.icio.us/demos.
- McLaughlin, C., & Hawkins, K. B. (2004). A Schools-University Research Partnership: understandings, models and complexities. Journal of In-Service Education.
- Mouton, J. (2006). How to succeed in your master's and doctoral studies: a South African Guide and Resource Book. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
- Mukesh, Ruheena, J., Uma, G., Han, J., & S, S. (2011). cross-species applicability of chicken microsatellite markers for investigation of genetic diversity in Indian duck (Anas platyrhynchos) populations. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(76), 17623-17631.
- Roger, G. B., & Deborah, A. C. (2007, Fall). Collaborating to Learn, Learning to Collaborate. Peer Review. 9(4). Association of American Colleges & Universities.
- Schwardt, T. A. (2007). The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry (3rd ed.). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Sharp, J. (1997, March 12). Communities of Practice: A Review of the Literature South Africa. http://home.att.net/~discon/KM/CoPReadi ngs
- Stenhouse, L. (1984). Evaluating Curriculum Evaluation, In C. Adelman (Ed.). The Politics and Ethics of Evaluation. London: Croom Helm.
- Ward, S. C. (1996). Reconfiguring truth: Postmodernism, science studies and the search for a new model of knowledge. Lanham, US/London: Rowman and Littlefield.
- Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. (2000). 'Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier. Harvard Business Review. 2(3), 139-145.
- Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Synder, W. (2002).
- Wood, S., Dukewich, K., & Denton, A. W. (2016). Promoting Pedagogy: The development of a Teaching and Learning cop in a Research Focused Department. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal. 9(1).
- Zboralski, K., & Germunden, H. G. (2006). The impact of Communities of Practice. Technical University Berlin, Germany. Idea Group, Inc.
Cite this article
-
APA : Yaqoob, G., Ramzan, S., & Gul, N. (2021). Impact of Community of Practice (COPs) on Inter-University Research Partnerships and Socio-Collaborative Culture in Balochistan. Global Educational Studies Review, VI(IV), 174-185. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-IV).18
-
CHICAGO : Yaqoob, Ghazala, Saubia Ramzan, and Nagina Gul. 2021. "Impact of Community of Practice (COPs) on Inter-University Research Partnerships and Socio-Collaborative Culture in Balochistan." Global Educational Studies Review, VI (IV): 174-185 doi: 10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-IV).18
-
HARVARD : YAQOOB, G., RAMZAN, S. & GUL, N. 2021. Impact of Community of Practice (COPs) on Inter-University Research Partnerships and Socio-Collaborative Culture in Balochistan. Global Educational Studies Review, VI, 174-185.
-
MHRA : Yaqoob, Ghazala, Saubia Ramzan, and Nagina Gul. 2021. "Impact of Community of Practice (COPs) on Inter-University Research Partnerships and Socio-Collaborative Culture in Balochistan." Global Educational Studies Review, VI: 174-185
-
MLA : Yaqoob, Ghazala, Saubia Ramzan, and Nagina Gul. "Impact of Community of Practice (COPs) on Inter-University Research Partnerships and Socio-Collaborative Culture in Balochistan." Global Educational Studies Review, VI.IV (2021): 174-185 Print.
-
OXFORD : Yaqoob, Ghazala, Ramzan, Saubia, and Gul, Nagina (2021), "Impact of Community of Practice (COPs) on Inter-University Research Partnerships and Socio-Collaborative Culture in Balochistan", Global Educational Studies Review, VI (IV), 174-185
-
TURABIAN : Yaqoob, Ghazala, Saubia Ramzan, and Nagina Gul. "Impact of Community of Practice (COPs) on Inter-University Research Partnerships and Socio-Collaborative Culture in Balochistan." Global Educational Studies Review VI, no. IV (2021): 174-185. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-IV).18