ARTICLE

IMPACT OF INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

41 Pages : 408-416

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-I).41      10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-I).41      Published : Mar 2021

Impact of Instructional Methods on the Performance of University Students

    Teaching is a continuous process for transmission of skills and knowledge attitudes in harmony with professional commitment. Transformation of knowledge involves teachers to use the appropriate instructional methods and pedagogical skills that best suit the learners. The study explored the effect of instructional methods on learners' achievement at the university level in pretest and posttest groups. The students studying in university of Lahore Sargodha Campus. The sample consisted of 40 students using a simple random sampling technique. The researchers used performance test score. The data were analyzed through inferential statistical test and mean and sd. The findings showed that both male and female university scholars had significant differences in the instructional methods in the posttest group. Male students were more prominent in activity-based, demonstration, and discussion methods. On the other hand, females were more prominent in lecture methods. The researchers recommended that teachers should use better innovative methods for the effective performance of students during the instructional process.

    Instructional Methods, Students' Achievement, Knowledge Transmission
    (1) Shahbaz Ahmad
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Muhammad Naveed Khalid
    Caardiff University, United Kingdom.
    (3) Muhammad Anees-ul-Hasnain Shah
    Associate Professor, Department of Education, University of Education Lahore, DGKhan Campus, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Abubakar, A. A. (2015). Effect of Instructional Video on Academic Performance in Social Studies Students in Secondary School in Kastina State, Nigeria. Unpublished M. ED Dissertation. Department of Educational Foundations and Curriculum, Faculty of Education, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
  • Adunola, O. (2011). The Impact of Teachers' Teaching Methods on the Academic Performance of Primary School Pupils in Ijebu-Ode Local cut Area of Ogun State,
  • Agboola, O. S., & Oloyede, E. O. (2007). Effect of Project, Inquiry and Lecture- demonstration teaching methods on Senior Secondary Students' Achievement in Separation of mixtures practical test. Educational Research and Review, 2(6), 124 - 126.
  • Ameh, P. O., & Dantani, Y. S. (2012). Effects of Lecture and Demonstration Methods on Students' Academic Achievement in Chemistry in Nassarawa Local Government Area of Kano State. International Journal of Modern Social Sciences, 1(1), 29-37.
  • Ayeni, A. J. (2011). Teachers professional development and quality assurance in Nigerian Secondary Schools. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 143-149.
  • Berry, W. (2008). Surviving lecture: A pedagogical alternative. College Teaching, 56,149-153.
  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. Granada Learning.
  • Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (1999). The challenge of problem-based learning. 2nd Ed., London, Kogan Page.
  • Clark, L. H., & Starr, I. S. (2001). Secondary and Middle School Teaching Methods, 6th Edition. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
  • Daluba, N. E. (2013). Effect of Demonstration Method of Teaching on Students' achievement in Agricultural Science. World Journal of Education, 3(6), 1-7.
  • Davis, J. R. (1993). Better Teaching, More Learning: Strategies for Success in Postsecondary Settings. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
  • Dolnicar, S. (2005). Should We Still Lecture or Just Post Examination Questions on the Web?: the nature of the shift towards pragmatism in undergraduate lecture attendance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(2), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320500175027
  • Erdem, E. (2012). Examination of the Effects of Project based Learning Approach on Students Attitudes towards Chemistry and Test Anxiety, World Applied Sciences Journal 17(6), 764-745.
  • Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with Style: A Practical Guide for Enhancing Learning by Understanding Teaching and Learning Styles. Pittsburgh, PA: Alliance Publishers.
  • Greitzer, F. A. (2002). Cognitive Approach to Student- Centered E-Learning, Human Factors and Society. 46th Annual Meeting, Sept 30 - Oct 4.
  • Grieve, D. (1995). A Handbook for Adjunct/Part- time Faculty and Teachers of Adults 3rded.Cleveland, OH: Info-Tec, Inc
  • Hesson, K., & Shad, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 372, 155-192.
  • Hesson, M., & Shad, K. F. (2007). A student- centered learning models. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 628-636.
  • Hightower, A. M. (2011). Improving student learning by supporting quality teaching: Key issues, effective strategies. Editorial Projects in Education
  • Hilligoss, T. (1992). Demystifying 'Classroom Chemistry': The Role of the Inter-active Learning Model. Teaching Sociology, 20, 12- 17.
  • Ifemuyinwa, G. L. (2008). Notes on Effective Methods of Teaching Preliminary Tests in Qualitative Analysis in Senior Secondary Schools. Effective Methods of Teaching Chemistry Practical. A Handbook for Chemistry Teachers by Science Teachers Association of Nigeria. Pp. 34-36.
  • Knight, J. K., & Wood, W. B. (2005) Teaching More by Lecturing Less. Cellular Biology Education. 4(4), 298-310.
  • Nbina, J. B., & Joseph, O. (2011). Assessment of the Effects of Problem Solving Instructional Strategies on Students' Achievement and Retention in Chemistry with Respect to Location in Rivers State. World Journal of Education, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n2p74.
  • Olorukooba, S. B. (2001). The Relative Effects of Cooperative Instructional Strategy and Traditional Method on the Performance of Senior Secondary School Chemistry Students. Unpublished Ph. D Dissertation Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.
  • Opara, F., & Waswa, P. (2013) Enhancing students' achievement in Chemistry through the Piagetian Model: The learning Cycle. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 4(4), 1270- 1278.
  • Shymansky, J. A., & Kyle, W. C., Jr. (2008). Learning and the Learner. Science Education, 72(3), 293-304.
  • Tebabal, A., & Kahssay, G. (2011). The effects of student-centered approach in improving students' graphical interpretation skills and conceptual understanding of kinematical motion. Lat. Am. Journal of Physical Education, 5(2), 374-381.
  • Theall, M., & Franklin, J. (2001). Looking for Bias in all the Wrong Places - A Search for Truth or a Witch Hunt in Student Ratings of Instruction? In the Student Ratings Debate: Are They Valid? How Can We Best Use Them? The all, P., Abrami, L. and Lisa Mets (Eds.) New Directions in Educational Research, no. 109. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
  • Tsai, C.-W. (2012). The role of teacher's initiation in online pedagogy. Education Training, 54(6), 456-471. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211254253.
  • Wulff, S. S., & Wulff, D. H. (2004). Of Course, I'm communicating; I Lecture Every Day: enhancing teaching and learning in Introductory statistics. Communication Education, 53(1), 92-103.

Cite this article

    APA : Ahmad, S., Khalid, M. N., & Shah, M. A. (2021). Impact of Instructional Methods on the Performance of University Students. Global Educational Studies Review, VI(I), 408-416. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-I).41
    CHICAGO : Ahmad, Shahbaz, Muhammad Naveed Khalid, and Muhammad Anees-ul-Hasnain Shah. 2021. "Impact of Instructional Methods on the Performance of University Students." Global Educational Studies Review, VI (I): 408-416 doi: 10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-I).41
    HARVARD : AHMAD, S., KHALID, M. N. & SHAH, M. A. 2021. Impact of Instructional Methods on the Performance of University Students. Global Educational Studies Review, VI, 408-416.
    MHRA : Ahmad, Shahbaz, Muhammad Naveed Khalid, and Muhammad Anees-ul-Hasnain Shah. 2021. "Impact of Instructional Methods on the Performance of University Students." Global Educational Studies Review, VI: 408-416
    MLA : Ahmad, Shahbaz, Muhammad Naveed Khalid, and Muhammad Anees-ul-Hasnain Shah. "Impact of Instructional Methods on the Performance of University Students." Global Educational Studies Review, VI.I (2021): 408-416 Print.
    OXFORD : Ahmad, Shahbaz, Khalid, Muhammad Naveed, and Shah, Muhammad Anees-ul-Hasnain (2021), "Impact of Instructional Methods on the Performance of University Students", Global Educational Studies Review, VI (I), 408-416
    TURABIAN : Ahmad, Shahbaz, Muhammad Naveed Khalid, and Muhammad Anees-ul-Hasnain Shah. "Impact of Instructional Methods on the Performance of University Students." Global Educational Studies Review VI, no. I (2021): 408-416. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-I).41