Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Process of Undergraduate Health and Physical Education Program by the CIPP Model
This study aimed to evaluate the process (instruction, activities, and assessment methods) of undergraduate health and physical education (HPE) programs in different colleges of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province by employing the CIPP model. A quantitative research technique was used to record the students' responses about the effectiveness of the process through questionnaires. Respondents showed mixed views about different parameters of the process. Students were satisfied with the use of audiovisual aids during instruction, promotion of critical thinking, social and moral values by instruction methods, class discussion, participation of teachers and students in physical activities, and instructions before a specific activity. A significant proportion of the respondents, however, believed that teachers did not use diverse teaching strategies and effective mediums of instruction. Similarly, negative responses were observed about rehabilitation techniques, the role of mentor ship in stimulating students' interest, and the regular arrangement of physical activities. Evaluation of the HPE program by the CIPP model identified some demerits in the process which need improvement to make the program more effective.
-
Instruction, Physical Activities, Medium of Instruction, Rehabilitation, Audiovisual Aids, Evaluation
-
(1) Zafar Iqbal
PhD Scholar, Department of Education, Qurtuba University of Science and Information Technology Peshawar, KP, Pakistan
(2) Rahim Khan
Associate Professor, Department of Education Qurtuba University of Science and Information Technology Peshawar, KP, Pakistan
(3) Abdul Wadood
Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology Peshawar, KP, Pakistan
- Alimohammadi, T., Rezaeian, M., Bakhshi, H., & VaziriNejad, R. (2013). The evaluation of the Medical School Faculty of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences based on the CIPP model in 2010. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, 12(3), 205-218.
- Amaewhule, W. A., & Wechie, N. (2021). Lecturers Perception of Process Evaluation of Undergraduate Economics of Education Programme of two Selected Nigerian Universities.
- Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, D., Jess, M., Pickup, I., Sandford, R., & Education, B. P. (2009). The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: an academic review. Research papers in education, 24(1), 1-27.
- Barrett, M. C., Arkhe, M. M., & Smilhe, C. (1996). Evaluating the graduates of the Dalhousie University School of Nursing baccalaureate programme: a quantitative/qualitative responsive model. Journal of advanced nursing, 24(5), 1070-1076.
- Darma, I. K. (2019). The Effectiveness of Teaching Program of CIPP Evaluation Model: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bali. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 5(3)
- Davis, B., Bull, R., Roscoe, J., Roscoe, D., & Saiz, M. (2000). Physical education and the study of sport.
- Donche, V., De Maeyer, S., Coertjens, L., Van Daal, T., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). Differential use of learning strategies in firstâ€year higher education: The impact of personality, academic motivation, and teaching strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 238-251.
- Gibbons, S. L., & Ebbeck, V. (1997). The effect of different teaching strategies on the moral development of physical education students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17(1), 85-98.
- Giridharan, K., & Raju, R. (2016). Impact of teaching strategies: demonstration and lecture strategies and impact of teacher effect on academic achievement in engineering education. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(3), 174-186
- Griebler, N., & Haunschmied, B. (2018). Evaluation of entrepreneurship education at universities with focus on the impact level: a systematic literature review/submitted by Nanette Griebler, BSC, Birgit Haunschmied, BSc (Doctoral dissertation, Universität Linz)
- Hasanah, S. S., Permanasari, A., & Riandi, R. (2021). Online Professional Development for Improving Teacher's STEM PCK Competence, Can It Be An Alternative?(An Evaluation Using the CIPP Model). Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 5(2), 162-171.
- Iqbal, Z., & Rashid, A. (2018). Assessment of the prevailing barriers in promoting physical activities among the inter level college students of district peshawar. the spark a hec Recognized Journal, 2(1), 82- 89.
- Iqbal, Z., Anees, M., Khan, R., Wadood, A., & Malik, S. (2021). A comparative analysis of the efficacy of three program- evaluation models–a review on their implication in educational programs. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 9(3), 326-336.
- Ma, L., Wang, Y., Mao, W., & Fu, H. (2009, December). The Performance Evaluation Model of Teaching-Research Universities in China. In 2009 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
- Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: Validity and reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 17(4), 59-82
- Obate-Yap, C., & Reston, E. D. Evaluation for undergraduate programs: The case of the BS Applied Physics in the University of San Carlos.
- Omane-Adjekum, C. (2016). Students evaluation of the bachelor of education (accounting) programme in the Universityof Cape Coast (Doctoral dissertation, University Of Cape Coast).
- Pearman III, S. N., Valois, R. F., Sargent, R. G., Saunders, R. P., Drane, J. W., & Macera, C. A. (1997). The impact of a required college health and physical education course on the health status of alumni. Journal of American College Health, 46(2), 77-85.
- Ranjbar, S., & Rahimi, R. (2021). A Quality Assessment of the Teaching Procedures, Faculty Performance and Curriculum of the Interpretation Courses at Bachelor's Level: A CIPP Approach. Translation Studies Quarterly, 19(73), 18-32.
- Richards, K. A. R., & Padaruth, S. (2017). Motivations for pursuing a career in physical education: The rise of a fitness orientation. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 88(4), 40-46.
- Rooholamini, A., Amini, M., Bazrafkan, L., Dehghani, M. R., Esmaeilzadeh, Z., Nabeiei, P., ... & Kojuri, J. (2017). Program evaluation of an integrated basic science medical curriculum in Shiraz Medical School, using CIPP evaluation model. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 5(3), 148.
- Stevens, T. A., To, Y., Stevenson, S. J., & Lochbaum, M. R. (2008). The importance of physical activity and physical education in the prediction of academic achievement. Journal of Sport Behavior, 31(4).
- Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In Evaluation models (pp. 279-317). Springer, Dordrecht.
- Stufflebeam, D. L. (2004). The 21st century CIPP model. Evaluation roots, 245-266.
- Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2012). Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice (Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media.
- Èšifrea, C., Giosan, A., & Costache, R. (2016). The importance of physical education and sport in the life of the students of the economy colleges. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 25(1), 428-436
- Tuna, H., & Badal, M. (2021). Curriculum evaluation of tourism undergraduate programs in Turkey: A CIPP model-based framework. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 29, 100324.
- Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57-84.
Cite this article
-
APA : Iqbal, Z., Khan, R., & Wadood, A. (2022). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Process of Undergraduate Health and Physical Education Program by the CIPP Model. Global Educational Studies Review, VII(II), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-II).27
-
CHICAGO : Iqbal, Zafar, Rahim Khan, and Abdul Wadood. 2022. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Process of Undergraduate Health and Physical Education Program by the CIPP Model." Global Educational Studies Review, VII (II): 285-295 doi: 10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-II).27
-
HARVARD : IQBAL, Z., KHAN, R. & WADOOD, A. 2022. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Process of Undergraduate Health and Physical Education Program by the CIPP Model. Global Educational Studies Review, VII, 285-295.
-
MHRA : Iqbal, Zafar, Rahim Khan, and Abdul Wadood. 2022. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Process of Undergraduate Health and Physical Education Program by the CIPP Model." Global Educational Studies Review, VII: 285-295
-
MLA : Iqbal, Zafar, Rahim Khan, and Abdul Wadood. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Process of Undergraduate Health and Physical Education Program by the CIPP Model." Global Educational Studies Review, VII.II (2022): 285-295 Print.
-
OXFORD : Iqbal, Zafar, Khan, Rahim, and Wadood, Abdul (2022), "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Process of Undergraduate Health and Physical Education Program by the CIPP Model", Global Educational Studies Review, VII (II), 285-295
-
TURABIAN : Iqbal, Zafar, Rahim Khan, and Abdul Wadood. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Process of Undergraduate Health and Physical Education Program by the CIPP Model." Global Educational Studies Review VII, no. II (2022): 285-295. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(VII-II).27