ARTICLE

MOTIVATIONAL TECHNIQUES USED BY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BASED ON GENDER

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

07 Pages : 62-70

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-III).07      10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-III).07      Published : Sep 2021

Motivational Techniques Used by Elementary School Teachers: A Comparative Analysis based on Gender

Abstract

    The study aimed to compare the emotional techniques of males and females at the elementary school level in Azad Jammu and Kashmir. The nature of this study was descriptive, and a cross-sectional survey was applied for the collection of data. All male and female teachers working in the elementary school of district Sudhnuti were the population of the study. Three hundred nine elementary school teachers of District Sudhnuti were selected by using a random sampling technique. A questionnaire was developed to collect data based on a five-point Like rt scale from elementary school teachers. For data collection, the researcher collected the data personally from the nearest areas while using the postal service for far-flung areas. The data collected through the questionnaire were analyzed by using mean scores and an independent sample t-test. It was found that there is a significant difference in the mean score of male and female teachers regarding motivational techniques. Furthermore, female teachers are using all the motivational techniques instead of male teachers.

    Motivational Techniques, Gender, Elementary school Teachers

    (1) Nazir Haider Shah
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Kotli, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.
    (2) Muhammad Naqeeb ul Khalil Shaheen
    Lecturer, Department of Education, University of Kotli, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.
    (3) Sobia Yaseen
    Lecturer, Department of Education, University of Kotli, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Brown, G. A., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (2013). Assessing student learning in higher education. Routledge.
  • Carayannis, E. G., Evans, D., & Hanson, M. (2003). A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More. London: Our Underachieving Colleges.
  • Chingos, M. M. (2013). Effect of different teaching methods and techniques embedded in the instructional model on students' learning about buoyancy force. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 4(2), 17-19
  • Corbett, K. (2001). More life: Centrality and marginality in human development. Psychoanalytic dialogues, 11(3), 313-335.
  • Cornish, E. (2004). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, 38, 685-705.
  • Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2007). Variations in the conditions for teachers' professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 423-443.
  • Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International journal of technology and design education, 13(3), 255-272.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Study of emerging Technology and their Impact on Teaching- Learning Process: Islamabad: AIOU
  • Fischer, R. (2007). How do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring students' behavior in CALL. Journal of Computer-assisted language learning, 20(5), 409-442.
  • Freeman, D. (2001). Second language teacher education. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages, 72- 79.
  • Gordon, T., & Burch, N. (2003). Teacher effectiveness training: The program proven to help teachers bring out the best in students of all ages. Three Rivers Press (CA).
  • Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2014). Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum. The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 255-281.
  • Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American educational research journal, 42(2), 371-406.
  • Lemov, D. (2010). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Washington DC: Routledge.
  • Nemer, K. M. (2002). Understudied education: Toward building a homeschooling research agenda. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
  • Newell, A. (2014). Growing up: Digital: How the technique changes work, education, and the ways students learn. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 12(3), 16-22
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self- determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
  • Schwab, J. J. (2001). The practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do. Curriculum Inquiry, 13(3), 239-265.
  • Sillitoe, A. (2010). The loneliness of the long- distance runner Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: a focus- group study. Worldwide magazine of science teaching, 22(4), 441-455.
  • Sykes, G., Bird, T., & Kennedy, M. (2010). Teacher education: Its problems and some prospects. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 464-476.
  • Tamir, P. (2000). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and teacher education, 4(2), 99-110.
  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and teacher education, 24(1), 80-91.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Shah, N. H., Shaheen, M. N. u. K., & Yaseen, S. (2021). Motivational Techniques Used by Elementary School Teachers: A Comparative Analysis based on Gender. Global Educational Studies Review, VI(III), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-III).07

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Shah, Nazir Haider, Muhammad Naqeeb ul Khalil Shaheen, and Sobia Yaseen. 2021. "Motivational Techniques Used by Elementary School Teachers: A Comparative Analysis based on Gender." Global Educational Studies Review, VI (III): 62-70 doi: 10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-III).07

HARVARD

    HARVARD : SHAH, N. H., SHAHEEN, M. N. U. K. & YASEEN, S. 2021. Motivational Techniques Used by Elementary School Teachers: A Comparative Analysis based on Gender. Global Educational Studies Review, VI, 62-70.

MHRA

    MHRA : Shah, Nazir Haider, Muhammad Naqeeb ul Khalil Shaheen, and Sobia Yaseen. 2021. "Motivational Techniques Used by Elementary School Teachers: A Comparative Analysis based on Gender." Global Educational Studies Review, VI: 62-70

MLA

    MLA : Shah, Nazir Haider, Muhammad Naqeeb ul Khalil Shaheen, and Sobia Yaseen. "Motivational Techniques Used by Elementary School Teachers: A Comparative Analysis based on Gender." Global Educational Studies Review, VI.III (2021): 62-70 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Shah, Nazir Haider, Shaheen, Muhammad Naqeeb ul Khalil, and Yaseen, Sobia (2021), "Motivational Techniques Used by Elementary School Teachers: A Comparative Analysis based on Gender", Global Educational Studies Review, VI (III), 62-70

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Shah, Nazir Haider, Muhammad Naqeeb ul Khalil Shaheen, and Sobia Yaseen. "Motivational Techniques Used by Elementary School Teachers: A Comparative Analysis based on Gender." Global Educational Studies Review VI, no. III (2021): 62-70. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-III).07