References

• Aguinis, H. (2009). An expanded view of performance management, 26-31. In: J. W. Smither and M. London (Eds.), Performance management: Putting research into action. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
• Akram, M., & Zepeda, S. J. (2015). Development and validation of a teacher self-assessment instrument. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 9(2),134 148.
• Arubayi, D. O. (2003). An Evaluation of the Current Research Efforts in Science Curriculum in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Society. 6(1), 99-103.
• Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2014). Research Methods. Pearson Education Limited.
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 53-106.
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage publications.
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage. (Eds.).
• Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268 291. edition). United Kingdom: Routledge.
• Farrer, F. (2000). A quiet revolution: Encouraging positive values in our children. London: Random House.
• Fauzier, F. A. (2009). Students’ perception of the teachers teaching of literature communicating and understanding through the eyes of the audience. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 17-26.
• Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publications Limited.
• Fontaine, D., & Keeling, A. W. (2017), “Compassionate care through the centuries: highlights in nursing history”, Nursing History Review, 25(1), 13-25.
• Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. A. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30, 1-32.
• Graue, E., & Johnson, E. (2011). Reclaiming assessment through accountability that is “just right.” Teachers College Record, 113(8), 140-149.
• Hollins, E. R. (2011). Teachers' preparation for quality teaching. Journal of Teachers Education, 62(4), 395-407.
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research fourth edition: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
• Jordan, W. J. (2010). Defining equity: Multiple perspectives to analysing the performance of diverse learners. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 142-178.
• Kpolovie, P. J. (2010). Advanced Research Methods. New Owerri, Nigeria, Springfield Publishers Ltd.
• Lovat, T. J. (2005). Values education and teachers’ work: A quality teaching perspective. National Values Education Forum, Australian Government Department of Education Science and Training.
• Morgan, D. L. (2018). Living within blurry boundaries: The value of distinguishing between qualitative and quantitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 268-279.
• Myers, M. D. (2019). Qualitative research in business and management. Sage Publications Limited.
• Nachmias, F. C., & Nachmias, D. (2009).
• Research methods in the social sciences. St. Martin's Press, Inc, London.
• Seldin, P. (1996). Improving college teaching: What works, what doesn’t? Paper presented at the 16th Annual Lilly Conference on College Teaching, Oxford, OH.
• Zbar, V., Marshall, G., & Power, P. (2007). Better schools, better teachers, better results: A handbook for improved performance management in your school. Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne.