TEACHERS MINDFUL CONCEPTION ABOUT THE USE OF STEM EDUCATION AT SECONDARY SCHOOL LEVEL

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-IV).12      10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-IV).12      Published : Dec 2021
Authored by : Khadija Rafeeq , Muhammad Qasim Ali , Naveed Zainab

12 Pages : 111-120

References

  • Akran, S. K, & Aşiroğlu, S. (2018). Perceptions of teachers towards the stem education and the constructivist education approach: is the constructivist education approach preparatory to STEM education? Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(10), 2175- 2186.
  • Awan, R. U. N., Sarwar, M., Mehdi, M., Noureen, G., & Anwar, N. (2017). Interests and Recruitment in Science: Factors Influencing Recruitment and Retention in STEM Education at University Level in Pakistan. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(3), 19- 43.
  • Banks, F., & Barlex, D. M. (2014). Beyond the subject silos in STEM-the case for ‘looking sideways' in the secondary school curriculum. In STEM Education and our Planet Making connections across contexts 3rd International Conference, 12-15 Jul 2014.
  • Bickman, L., & Rog, D. J. (1998). Handbook of applied social research methods. British Journal of Educational Studies, 46, 351-351.
  • Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.
  • Brown, J., Brown, R., & Merrill, C. (2011). Science and technology educators' enacted curriculum: Areas of possible collaboration for an integrative STEM approach in public schools. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(4), 30.
  • Buczynski, S., & Hansen, C. B. (2010). Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 599-607.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge Publications.
  • Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers in the age of innovation. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 74-85.
  • Daugherty, M. K. (2013). The Prospect of an
  • Ertmer, P., Lehman, J., Park, S., Cramer, J., & Grove, K. (2003). ADOPTION AND USE OF TECHNOLOGY-SUPPORTED LEARNER-CENTERED PEDAGOGIES: BARRIERS TO TEACHERS'IMPLEMENTATION. In EdMedia Innovate Learning (pp. 1955- 1958). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  • Frechtling, J. A., Merlino, F. J., & Stephenson, K. (2015). The call to transform postsecondary STEM educational practices and institutional policies. American Journal of Educational Studies, 7(1), 27.
  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
  • Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Selecting measuring instruments. Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications, 149-182.
  • Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM integration in middle school life science: Student learning and attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 550-560.
  • Hali, A. U., Aslam, S., Zhang, B., & Saleem, A. (2021). An Overview on STEM Education in Pakistan: Situation and Challenges. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 12(1), 12A1T-1.
  • Kennedy, J., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60(2), 34-46.
  • Memon, G. R., Joubish, M. F., & Khurram, M. A. (2010). The perceptions of quality assurance in educational institutions of Pakistan. World Applied Sciences Journal, 11(12), 1494-1499.
  • Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future.
  • Rehman, A., & Butt, I. H. (2020). Elementary School Female Students' Attitude towards STEM. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 6(2), 511-515.
  • Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 16-21.
  • Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4-27.
  • Schlechty, P. C. (2011). Engaging students: The next level of working on the work. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Stinson, K., Harkness, S. S., Meyer, H., & Stallworth, J. (2009). Mathematics and science integration: Models and characterizations. School Science and Mathematics, 109(3), 153-161.
  • Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2(1), 4.
  • Stromquist, N. P., & Monkman, K. (2014). Globalization and education: Integration and contestation across cultures. R&L Education.
  • Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963-980.
  • Wee, B., Shepardson, D., Fast, J., & Harbor, J. (2007). Teaching and learning about inquiry:Insights and challenges in professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 63-89.
  • Williams, H. S., & Kingham, M. (2003). Infusion of technology into the curriculum. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(3), 178.
  • Yata, C., Ohtani, T., & Isobe, M. (2020). Conceptual framework of STEM based on Japanese subject principles. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-10.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Rafeeq, K., Ali, M. Q., & Zainab, N. (2021). Teachers' Mindful Conception about the Use of STEM Education at Secondary School Level. Global Educational Studies Review, VI(IV), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-IV).12

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Rafeeq, Khadija, Muhammad Qasim Ali, and Naveed Zainab. 2021. "Teachers' Mindful Conception about the Use of STEM Education at Secondary School Level." Global Educational Studies Review, VI (IV): 111-120 doi: 10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-IV).12

HARVARD

    HARVARD : RAFEEQ, K., ALI, M. Q. & ZAINAB, N. 2021. Teachers' Mindful Conception about the Use of STEM Education at Secondary School Level. Global Educational Studies Review, VI, 111-120.

MHRA

    MHRA : Rafeeq, Khadija, Muhammad Qasim Ali, and Naveed Zainab. 2021. "Teachers' Mindful Conception about the Use of STEM Education at Secondary School Level." Global Educational Studies Review, VI: 111-120

MLA

    MLA : Rafeeq, Khadija, Muhammad Qasim Ali, and Naveed Zainab. "Teachers' Mindful Conception about the Use of STEM Education at Secondary School Level." Global Educational Studies Review, VI.IV (2021): 111-120 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Rafeeq, Khadija, Ali, Muhammad Qasim, and Zainab, Naveed (2021), "Teachers' Mindful Conception about the Use of STEM Education at Secondary School Level", Global Educational Studies Review, VI (IV), 111-120

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Rafeeq, Khadija, Muhammad Qasim Ali, and Naveed Zainab. "Teachers' Mindful Conception about the Use of STEM Education at Secondary School Level." Global Educational Studies Review VI, no. IV (2021): 111-120. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-IV).12